·
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHmqI9gOAtk&feature=youtu.be
o
SCSI Logic
o
Sara
Kazemi Nathan Warren-Acord Ryan Dorrity Cody Young
·
is the topic well covered?
o
yes
·
is the presentation clear?
o
Yes
o
At 2:24 the chart wasn’t up long enough
to read
·
how is the quality of the research?
o
good
·
how is the quality of the video
production?
o
Very good. The pictures were informative
and the music was not too distracting.
·
is the video engaging and interesting?
o
Yes, it had many interesting pictures
but it would have been nice to have an intro so we knew what we were going to
learn.
·
is the team work evident?
o
Yes, all team members had time to talk
·
is the video appropriate to the audience
(either general public or technology professionals)
o
yes, it was easy to understand even
though it was a difficult topic.
o
I think the general public video was
good because it used a lot of imagery kids like , like memes or meme like
images.
o
JAAZ Software
o
Aaron Newman, Anthony Davis, Jacob West,
Zachariah Thomas
·
is the topic well covered?
o
yes
·
is the presentation clear?
o
Yes, it was clear because the graphics
and words were simple.
·
how is the quality of the research?
o
Blockchain might be secure but the
exchanges are not when the point is to get your money in real life eventually.
o
I thought it would be good to mention
the darker side of bitcoin/crypto eg kidnappings, murder, drug dealing.
·
how is the quality of the video
production?
o
Very good, there weren’t errors or jumpy
places.
·
is the video engaging and interesting?
o
Yes, I found it interesting and learned
a lot about blockchain.
·
is the team work evident?
o
Yes, all of the team members were able
to talk.
·
is the video appropriate to the audience
(either general public or technology professionals)
o
No, I think it was appropriate for the
general public but not academically rigorous enough for technology
professionals.
o
Northwestern Technology
o
Brian Sheridan, Kevin Bentley, Craig
Calvert, Samuel Pearce
·
is the topic well covered?
o
yes
·
is the presentation clear?
o
Yes. It gave a lot of info about how many
there are and what its growth has been. It also gave good info on the monetary
cost of replacing a worker. I always thought it would be a lot more money to
install one. In my city, of Merced I’ve only seen them in one Mcdonalds and one
Walmart but not Food4less or Savemart.
·
how is the quality of the research?
o
I would say they are not as fast as the
checkout clerk because they tend to need a clerk to help fix problems. If I’m
buying more than 5 things, I need help with the self checkout because of a
weight error or such.
·
how is the quality of the video
production?
o
Very god
·
is the video engaging and interesting?
o
Yes. I liked the drawing in the videos.
·
is the team work evident?
o
yes
·
is the video appropriate to the audience
(either general public or technology professionals)
o
yes
Part 2: Keep Up With Your Learning Journal
Add the last entry about what you have learned in
the class. How have your team communicated and/or collaborated? What can
you do to make that collaboration more effective next time?
In
our team, we did not stick to the schedule as in recording the video on
Thursday. We ended up recording the video at 10pm on Saturday. I would say we
had decent communication, we knew who was going to be available when and for
how long. I think we would need to
divide the time equally by the person because a lot of my parts were examples
and not exactly core content. A lot of my work was cut in the final edit so it
looks like I wasn’t doing anything. I think we should have separated the sections
by topic so one person has the first 3, the next has the next 3 and so on. We
could then edit it on our own to fit our time allotment and then combine them
at the end.
Our Team Videos
No comments:
Post a Comment